@JadenMcCallum Just to let you know, you are unbelievably stupid and ignorant. Now, I get what you're saying and understand why you'd say it, but your logic is flawed. Seriously, you're saying that everyone needs guns to protect themselves from people with guns. WTF? Maybe guns should not be banned completely, because they do provide a sense of security, but there at least needs to be stricter regulations. For one thing, why the hell do you need automatic assult rifles? If you can answer that without saying something incredibly stupid, then... well then I don't know because you can't answer that without saying something incredibly stupid, because there is no logical answer. You do not need an automatic weapon to protect yourself. Automatic guns (assult rifles, smgs, lmgs) are meant to kill lots of people. It does not take 30 bullets to kill one person. All it takes to stop someones pulse is one bullet, as long as its coming from a gun held by someone who knows how to use it. So if there was someone who openfired, they could be stopped by someone with a handgun. But saying all that is redundant because, well, you say having guns like you do keeps you safe? Okay, how has that worked out so far? How has having people with guns helped stop mass shootings? Lets look at this school shooting shall we, no civilians used their guns to stop him. Or the Colorado shooting. No one with guns stopped that. The only people with guns who stop these things, are the police. Therefore, the average person's gun isn't helping stop this shit. So unless you're insisting to solve this gun problem by buying more guns, which just does not make sense, I would really like to know what you think. Because he way I see it, guns cause more damage than they prevent. Look at the above statistics. Guess which in country its easiest to get guns? The States. Now guess in which country not even the police carry guns? Great Britain. I've got more to say, but no space. Bottom line is, BJ is right.